4.3 KiB
codeflash-agent — how this repo works
Packages (UV workspace)
packages/codeflash-core/— shared foundation: models, AI client, telemetry, git helperspackages/codeflash-python/— Python language CLI (codeflashcommand), extends corepackages/codeflash-mcp/— MCP server (stub)packages/codeflash-lsp/— LSP server (stub)
Services
services/github-app/— GitHub App integration service
Plugin (language-agnostic)
plugin/agents/codeflash-review.md— review agentplugin/agents/codeflash-researcher.md— research agentplugin/commands/— codex CLI commandsvendor/codex/— codex companion scripts and schemas (vendored)plugin/references/shared/— shared methodology (experiment loop, templates, benchmarks)plugin/hooks/— session lifecycle and review gate hooks
Languages (per-language content)
languages/python/plugin/agents/codeflash.md— router that detects the domain and delegateslanguages/python/plugin/agents/codeflash-cpu.md,codeflash-memory.md,codeflash-async.md,codeflash-structure.md— one agent per domainlanguages/python/plugin/agents/codeflash-setup.md— detects project env, installs depslanguages/python/plugin/skills/—/codeflash-optimizeentry point, memray profilinglanguages/python/plugin/references/— domain-specific deep-dive docs (async, memory, data-structures, structure)
Evals
evals/templates/— 9 synthetic eval scenarios (v1: ranking, memory, crossdomain, layered)evals/repos/— real-repo evals (v2: clone a repo at a specific commit, agent finds and fixes the bug)
CI (runs on every PR)
The validate workflow runs Claude with the plugin-dev plugin to check:
- Plugin structure (frontmatter, manifest, cross-references)
- Agent consistency (all domain agents must have the same experiment loop steps)
- Eval manifest validity
- Skill quality
Warnings are blocking — any issue fails the job. Claude posts a summary comment on the PR.
Evals
Two types of evals, both run through run-eval.sh:
v1 (templates) — Small synthetic projects in evals/templates/. Each bundles source code, tests, and a pyproject.toml. The runner copies the template to a temp dir, installs deps with uv, and runs Claude. Good for testing specific agent behaviors (ranking accuracy, memory profiling methodology, cross-domain detection). 9 templates across ranking, memory, crossdomain, and layered types.
v2 (repos) — Real repos in evals/repos/. Each has a manifest.json pointing to a GitHub repo + commit where a known bug exists. The runner shallow-clones the repo (cached locally after first run), drops Claude in, and the agent handles everything — setup, profiling, diagnosis, fix. More realistic but slower and more expensive (~$2/run). The manifest includes a fix_commit for reference and a rubric for scoring.
Each eval produces results in evals/results/<name>-<timestamp>/. Score with score.py, which uses a mix of deterministic checks (did the agent use a profiler? did tests pass?) and LLM grading against the manifest's rubric.
Regression testing — Go to Actions → "Eval Regression" → Run workflow. Runs a subset of evals, scores them, compares to baselines in evals/baseline-scores.json. Fails if any score drops below threshold. Use before merging agent behavior changes.
./evals/run-eval.sh --list # see all evals (v1 + v2)
./evals/run-eval.sh ranking --skill-only # run a v1 eval
./evals/run-eval.sh codeflash-internal-psycopg-serialization --skill-only # run a v2 eval
./evals/score-eval.sh evals/results/<dir> # score it
./evals/check-regression.sh # full regression check
Key conventions
- Domain agents are self-contained — all methodology is inline, no required file reads before starting
- Every agent uses the same experiment loop structure (choose target → implement → benchmark → keep/discard → commit only on KEEP)
- Changes to one domain agent should be mirrored to others where applicable (CI enforces this)
- The plugin uses
.codeflash/in the user's project for session state (results.tsv, HANDOFF.md)
Contributing
- Branch off main
- Make changes, push — CI validates automatically
- If you changed agent behavior, trigger an eval regression run before merging